Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Fabian SANTIAGO, Petitioner, v. Arthur F. HILL, Associate Judge, Circuit Court of Illinois, Cook County., 2020 — 140 S. Ct. 1244 · caselaw · US
General
Fabian SANTIAGO, Petitioner, v. Arthur F. HILL, Associate Judge, Circuit Court of Illinois, Cook County.
140 S. Ct. 1244206 L. Ed. 2d 172·Supreme Court of the United States·2020
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Fabian SANTIAGO, Petitioner,
v.
Arthur F. HILL, Associate Judge, Circuit Court of Illinois, Cook County.
No. 19-6844.
Supreme Court of the United States.
February 24, 2020
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois dismissed. See Rule 39.8.