Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John I. Tilton, Respondent, v. Susan M. Vail et al., Impleaded, etc., Appellants, 1888 — 110 N.Y. 681 · caselaw · US
General
John I. Tilton, Respondent, v. Susan M. Vail et al., Impleaded, etc., Appellants
110 N.Y. 681·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John I. Tilton, Respondent, v. Susan M. Vail et al., Impleaded, etc., Appellants.
(Argued October 16, 1888;
decided October 26, 1888.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made January 3, 1887, which reversed an order of Special Term, denying motion on the part of plaintiff for an order of reference to take proof of title, etc., and which granted said motion.
Alexander Thain for appellants.
William C. Reecher for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.