Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Alviso v. United States, 1866 — 72 U.S. 824 · caselaw · US
General
Alviso v. United States
72 U.S. 8245 Wall. 824·Supreme Court of the United States·1866
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Alviso v. United States.
A citation to the adverse party, with' due return or waiver by general appearance, or otherwise, is indispensable to jurisdiction on appeal.
On motion to dismiss an appeal from the District Court for Northern California,
[MAJORITY — the GHIEF JUSTICE]
the GHIEF JUSTICE
stated the case and gave the.opinion of the court.
The final decree in the District Court was rendered on ,the 8th September, 1868., and an appeal was allowed, on motion of the claimant, on the 18th November, 1863. Upon this appeal no action- was taken by the appellants. On the .23d February, 1864, an appeal was again allowed, and the record was brought to this court .and filed November 11, 1864.
This was in time, but no citation was issued to the adverse party, and there is nothing to show any waiver; and a citation, with due return, or waiver by general appearance or otherwise, is indispensable to jurisdiction on appeal.
The writ, therefore, must be
Dismissed.
Bacon v. Hart, Black, 38; Castro v. United States, 3 Wallace, 49.