Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Emily J. Charde et al., Respondents, v. The City of Brooklyn, Appellant; Maria O. Simms, as Executrix, Respondent, v. The City of Brooklyn, Appellant, 1895 — 147 N.Y. 703 · caselaw · US
General
Emily J. Charde et al., Respondents, v. The City of Brooklyn, Appellant; Maria O. Simms, as Executrix, Respondent, v. The City of Brooklyn, Appellant
147 N.Y. 703·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Emily J. Charde et al., Respondents, v. The City of Brooklyn, Appellant. Maria O. Simms, as Executrix, Respondent, v. The City of Brooklyn, Appellant.
Ohwrde v. City of Brooklyn (8 Misc. Rep. 598), reversed.
Reported below, 87 Hun, 85.
(Argued October 8, 1895;
decided October 22, 1895.)
Appeal in the Charde case from judgment of the General Term of the City Court of Brooklyn, entered upon an order made May 28, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Albert G. McDonald and B. B. Greenwood, Jr., for appellant.
Oscarr Frisbie for respondents.
Appeal in the Simms case from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made May 13, 1895, which reversed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and ordered a. new trial.
Albert G. 'McDonald and R. B. Greenwood, Jr., for appellant.
JEseh Oowen for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed in Simms case.
Judgment reversed in Oharde case on the opinions of General Term in the Simms case, with costs.
All concur.