Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Sarah Roche, Appellant, v. Supreme Lodge, Knights of Honor, Respondent, 1899 — 159 N.Y. 529 · caselaw · US
General
Sarah Roche, Appellant, v. Supreme Lodge, Knights of Honor, Respondent
159 N.Y. 529·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Sarah Roche, Appellant, v. Supreme Lodge, Knights of Honor, Respondent.
(Submitted April 17, 1899;
decided April 25, 1899.)
Motion by appellant for an order to show cause why an order should not be made vacating an order entered March 7, 1899, dismissing the .appeal herein by reason of alleged laches.
W. B. Donihee for motion.
W. R. Spooner opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted on payment of ten dollars costs to respondent.