Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
LEE COUNTY v. CLEWS, 1874 — 154 U.S. 609 · caselaw · US
General
LEE COUNTY v. CLEWS
154 U.S. 609·Supreme Court of the United States·1874
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
LEE COUNTY v. CLEWS.
ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA.
No. 79.
Argued aud submitted November 30, 1874.
Decided December 21, 1874.
Chambers County v. Clews, 21 Wall. 317, followed.
Mr. R. T. Merrick for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Samuel F. Rice for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Justice Hunt]
Mr. Justice Hunt
delivered the opinion of the court.
The case of The County of Lee, plaintiff in error, v. Clews, defendant, (No. 79,) involves the same questions and is decided by the same principles as Chambers County v. Clews, 21 Wall. 317.
The judgment is Affirmed.