Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Dominico Calabur, Respondent, 1904 — 178 N.Y. 608 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Dominico Calabur, Respondent
178 N.Y. 608·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Dominico Calabur, Respondent.
Reported below, 91 App. Div. 529.
(Argued April 25, 1904;
decided May 3, 1904.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 11, 1904, which reversed a judgment of the Kings County Court entered upon a verdict convicting' the defendant of the crime of ássault in the -first degree and granted a new trial.
The motion was made upon the grounds that the Appellate Division reversed the judgment of conviction as a matter of discretion and that, therefore, no questions of law are presented which the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction to review. •
Francis L. Corrao for motion.
John F. Clark, District Attorney (.Robert H. Roy of counsel), opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied.