Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
JONES MOTOR CO., INC., v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION et al., 1959 — 361 U.S. 11 · caselaw · US
General
JONES MOTOR CO., INC., v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION et al.
361 U.S. 11·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
JONES MOTOR CO., INC., v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION et al.
No. 120.
Decided October 12, 1959.
Roland Rice, William J. Wilcox and Christian V. Craj for petitioner.
William A. Coichman, Louis J. Carter and Thomas M. Kerrigan for the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, respondent.
Harold S. Shertz for Intervening Respondents.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Service Storage & Transfer Co. v. Virginia, 359 U. S. 171.