Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
OMAHA STANDARD BODY CO., Appellant, v. FUCHS EQUIPMENT CO. et al., 1933 — 68 F.2d 1012 · caselaw · US
General
OMAHA STANDARD BODY CO., Appellant, v. FUCHS EQUIPMENT CO. et al.
68 F.2d 1012·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
OMAHA STANDARD BODY CO., Appellant, v. FUCHS EQUIPMENT CO. et al.
No. 9730.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Nov. 21, 1933.
George S. Wright, Addison G. Kistle, and Paul E. Roadifer, all of Council Blurts, Iowa for appellant.
A. E. Royce, of Omaha, Neb., and Raymond A. Smith, of Council Bluffs Iowa, for appellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution, on motion of appellees.