Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Patrick Skelly, Respondent, v. The New York Elevated Railroad Company et al., Appellants, 1896 — 148 N.Y. 747 · caselaw · US
General
Patrick Skelly, Respondent, v. The New York Elevated Railroad Company et al., Appellants
148 N.Y. 747·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Patrick Skelly, Respondent, v. The New York Elevated Railroad Company et al., Appellants.
Reported below, 7 Misc. Rep. 88.
(Argued January 23, 1896;
decided February 18, 1896.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Court of Common Pleas for the city and county of New Yorkf entered upon an order made January 4, 1894, which affirmed ia judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of ithe court on trial at an Equity Term.
Reuben Leslie Maynard for appellants.
Edward W. S. Johnston for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.