Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
THRIFTY SHOPPERS SCRIP CO. v. UNITED STATES et al., 1968 — 389 U.S. 580 · caselaw · US
General
THRIFTY SHOPPERS SCRIP CO. v. UNITED STATES et al.
389 U.S. 580·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
THRIFTY SHOPPERS SCRIP CO. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 820.
Decided January 15, 1968.
David B. Gold for appellant in No. 820. Howard M. Downs for appellants in No. 849.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner and Daniel M. Friedman for the United States in both cases. William W. Alsup, Allyn 0. Kreps, Arnold M. Lerman, William E. Mussman and Gordon Johnson for appellees Blue Chip Stamp Co. et al. in both cases.
Together with No. 849, Twyman, dba Bill’s Union Station, et al. v. United States et al., also on appeal from the same court.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.