Corporations
CADY LUMBER CORPORATION et al., Petitioners, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent
68 F.2d 995·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CADY LUMBER CORPORATION et al., Petitioners, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent.
No. 6733.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 20, 1934.
MeCutehen, Olney, Mannon & Greene, of San Francisco, Cal., for petitioners.
Robert E. Healy, Chief Counsel, Federal Trade Commission, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Before WILBUR, SAWTELLE, and GARRE CHT, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to mandate and opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States in Al-goma Lumber Co. et al. v. Federal Trade Commission, 54 S. Ct. 67, 78 L. Ed.-, and stipulation of counsel that this cause abide final disposition of that ease, it is ordered that a decree be filed and entered in this cause affirming the order of the Federal Trade Commission, and that the mandate issue forthwith.