Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
James G. Byars, Appellant, v. Bennington and Hoosick Valley Railway Company, Respondent, 1906 — 184 N.Y. 554 · caselaw · US
General
James G. Byars, Appellant, v. Bennington and Hoosick Valley Railway Company, Respondent
184 N.Y. 554·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James G. Byars, Appellant, v. Bennington and Hoosick Valley Railway Company, Respondent.
Byars v. Bennington & H. V. Ry. Co., 99 App. Div. 34, affirmed.
(Argued February 13, 1906;
decided February 27, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in , the third judicial department, entered December 10, 1904, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term.
J. K. Long and Thomas 8. Fagan for appellant.
P. R. Chapman and George F. Greene for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann and Willard Bartlett, JJ. Absent: Cullen, Ch. J. Not sitting: Chase, J.