Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. UNITED OIL COMPANY, Respondent, 1933 — 65 F.2d 1014 · caselaw · US
Tax
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. UNITED OIL COMPANY, Respondent
65 F.2d 1014·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. UNITED OIL COMPANY, Respondent.
No. 7200.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 27, 1933.
Sewall Key, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., and C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Frederick 0. Graves, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Before SAWTELLE and GARRECHT, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to stipulation of counsel, ordered that judgment be entered herein that the deficiency in federal income tax for the taxable years ■ 1923 and 1924 is $2.45 and $3,693.43, respectively, and that there is an overpayment of federal income tax for the taxable year 1925 in the amount of $18,966.-97.