General
H. L. WILLIFORD, Receiver, et al., Petitioners, v. Willis B. CAUBLE et al.
2 F.2d 1023·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1924
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
H. L. WILLIFORD, Receiver, et al., Petitioners, v. Willis B. CAUBLE et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
September 15, 1924.)
No. 257 Orig.
Petition to Revise Order of the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Arkansas.
Joe K. Mahony, of El Dorado, Ark., W. T. Saye and J. N. Sayo, both of Little Rock. Ark., and Jeff Davis, of El Dorado, Ark., for petitioners.
J. M. Foster, F. J. Looney, W. A. Wilkinson, and M. K. Smith, all of Shreveport, La., Will Steel, of Texarkana, Ark., H. S. Powell, H. P. Smead, and R. C. Knox, all of El Dorado, Arle., and A. D. Keeney, of Shreveport, La., for respondents.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Petition to revise dismissed, at costs of petitioners, etc., per stipulation of parties.