Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lori Rappaport LaCROIX, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY, et al., 2016 — 136 S. Ct. 996 · caselaw · US
Criminal Law · MBE-tested
Lori Rappaport LaCROIX, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY, et al.
136 S. Ct. 996194 L. Ed. 2d 2·Supreme Court of the United States·2016
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lori Rappaport LaCROIX, petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY, et al.
No. 15-7199.
Supreme Court of the United States
Jan. 25, 2016.
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for a writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (per curiam ).