Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Dictograph Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, 1955 — 349 U.S. 940 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Dictograph Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
349 U.S. 940·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 714.
Dictograph Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission.
Louis P. Hafjer for petitioner.
Solicitor General Sobelofj, Assistant Attorney General Barnes, Charles F. Barber, Daniel M. Friedman, Earl W. Kintner and Robert B. Dawkins for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.