Contracts · MBE-tested
United States v. California
375 U.S. 927·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
December 2, 1963.
No. 5,
Original.
United States v. California.
Solicitor General Cox and George S. Swarth for the United States. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Charles E. Corker and Howard S. Goldin, Assistant Attorneys General, and Jay L. Shavelson, Warren J. Abbott and N. Gregory Taylor, Deputy Attorneys General, for defendant.
[For opinion and decree in this case, see 332 U. S. 19, 804.]
[MAJORITY]
The motion of the United States for leave to file a supplemental complaint herein is granted. The motion of California to dismiss the case is denied and California is allowed 60 days to answer. Both parties, should they so desire, are allowed 60 days to file additional exceptions to the Special Master's Report filed on November 10, 1952, together with briefs in support of the exceptions already filed and such additional exceptions, if any. The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.