Contracts · MBE-tested
Max Weinberg et al., Appellants, v. Pincus Schrank et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others
191 N.Y. 539·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Max Weinberg et al., Appellants, v. Pincus Schrank et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others.
Weinberg v. Schrank, 115 App. Div. 347, affirmed.
(Argued February 26, 1908;
decided March 13, 1908.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 5, 1906, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and granting a new trial in an action to impress a lien upon real property for an amount paid under a contract of sale.
Milton Mayer, for appellants.
Wayland E. Benjamin, for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; ho opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Haight, Yann, Werner, Hiscocic and Chase, JJ.