Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William C. Breed et al., as Receivers of the New York National Building and Loan Association, Appellants, v. Leonard Ruoff, Sr., et al., Respondents, 1902 — 171 N.Y. 691 · caselaw · US
General
William C. Breed et al., as Receivers of the New York National Building and Loan Association, Appellants, v. Leonard Ruoff, Sr., et al., Respondents
171 N.Y. 691·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William C. Breed et al., as Receivers of the New York National Building and Loan Association, Appellants, v. Leonard Ruoff, Sr., et al., Respondents.
Breed v. Buoff, 69 App. Div. 620, appeal dismissed.
(Submitted June 12, 1902;
decided June 27, 1902.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 18, 1902, denying a motion by plaintiffs for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from a former judgment which affirmed an interlocutory judgment entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
G. D. B. Hasbrouick and Russel B. Johnson for appellants.
Thaddeus D. Kenneson for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur : Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.