Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William H. Cromwell et al., Respondents, v. George L. Burr, Appellant, 1890 — 121 N.Y. 693 · caselaw · US
General
William H. Cromwell et al., Respondents, v. George L. Burr, Appellant
121 N.Y. 693·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William H. Cromwell et al., Respondents, v. George L. Burr, Appellant.
(Argued June 2, 1890;
decided June 10, 1890.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the General Term of the Court of Common Pleas for the city and county of New York, made December 9, 1881, which affirmed a judgment of the General Term of the City Court of New York, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict.
William J. Lynch for motion.
Wakemam, & Latiimg opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.