Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Louis PIQUETT v. William McDONNELL, United States Marshal, 1934 — 73 F.2d 1019 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Louis PIQUETT v. William McDONNELL, United States Marshal
73 F.2d 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Louis PIQUETT v. William McDONNELL, United States Marshal.
No. 5335.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Sept. 20, 1934.
Benjamin Landis, of Chicago, 111., for appellant.
Dwight H. Green, of Chicago, 111., for appellee.
Before FITZHENRY and PAGE, Circuit Judges, and WTLKERSON, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Now this day come the parties by their counsel and this cause now comes on to be heard on the transcript of the record from tho District Court of the Uidted States for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, and was argued by counsel.
On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the said District Court in this cause appealed from ho, and the same is hereby, reversed, and that this cause be, and the same is hereby, remanded to the said District Court, with direction to grant the writ of habeas corpus, and to admit the appellant, Louis Piquett, to bail upon the filing and approval of a bond in the sum of $10,-000 in each of the cases pending against him in the said District Court.
It is further ordered that the mandate of this court issue forthwith.