General

Thomas M. King et al., Respondents, v. Reon Barnes, Impleaded, etc., Appellant; Same, Respondents, v. Same, Appellant

110 N.Y. 627·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Thomas M. King et al., Respondents, v. Reon Barnes, Impleaded, etc., Appellant. Same, Respondents, v. Same, Appellant. (Argued. February 28, 1888; decided June 12, 1888.) Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, made December 3, 1887, which affirmed an order of Special Term, giving “ further directions ” at the foot of the final judgment herein; also appeal from order of said General Term, which affirmed an order of Special, adjudging the appellant to be in contempt for refusing to comply with said final judgment. Noah Davis for appellant. Albert B. Boardman, for respondents. [MAJORITY] Agree to affirm; no opinion. All concur. Orders affirmed.