General
Minneapolis and St. Louis Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. David D. Gano et al.
190 U.S. 557·Supreme Court of the United States·1903
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 279.
Minneapolis and St. Louis Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. David D. Gano et al.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Iowa.
Submitted May 1, 1903.
Decided May 4, 1903.
Mr. Albert E. Clarke for plaintiff in error.
No brief filed for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with costs and interest, on the authority of Electric Company v. Dow, 166 U. S. 489; Railroad Company v. Matthews, 174 U. S. 96; St. Louis etc. Railway Company v. Paul, 173 U. S. 404. See 114 Iowa, 713.