General
Orrin D. Person, Respondent, v. Joseph A. Stoll et al., Appellants
171 N.Y. 687·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Orrin D. Person, Respondent, v. Joseph A. Stoll et al., Appellants.
Reported below, 72 App. Div. 141.
(Submitted June 16, 1902;
decided June 24, 1902.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first, judicial department, entered December 2, 1901, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
The motion was made upon the grounds that the Court of Appeals has no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal; that the decision of the Appellate Division was unanimous; that there are no questions of law to be reviewed; that no leave to appeal has been granted ; that the exceptions are frivolous and that the appeal is for the purpose of delay only.
Gilbert W. Minor for motion.
Eugene Van Schaick opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied.