Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
THE ELIZA HANCOX v. LANGDON, 1875 — 154 U.S. 618 · caselaw · US
Admiralty
THE ELIZA HANCOX v. LANGDON
154 U.S. 61823 L. Ed. 214·Supreme Court of the United States·1875
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
THE ELIZA HANCOX v. LANGDON.
APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA.
No. 36.
Argued November 9 and 10, 1875.
Decided November 15, 1875.
The decree below is affirmed on the facts.
Mr. E. G. Benedict and Mr. Bobert Failigant for appellant.
Mr. Bufus E. Lester and Mr. William U. Garrard for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Chief. Justice Waite]
Mr. Chief. Justice Waite
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is one of a class of cases in admiralty, in which appeals are taken to this court upon questions of fact when there have been two concurring opinions in the court below. Wé think the finding below, as to the culpable fault of the Hancox, was clearly right, and are not satisfied that, as to the damages,. it was wrong.
The decree of the Circuit Court is Affirmed.