Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Timothy Mahoney, Respondent, v. George Bernhard et al., Defendants, and Henry W. Schmidt et al., as Executors of Henry Clausen, Jr., Deceased, et al., Appellants, and Edward H. Hobbs et al., as Receivers of the Murray Hill Bank, Respondents, 1901 — 169 N.Y. 589 · caselaw · US
General
Timothy Mahoney, Respondent, v. George Bernhard et al., Defendants, and Henry W. Schmidt et al., as Executors of Henry Clausen, Jr., Deceased, et al., Appellants, and Edward H. Hobbs et al., as Receivers of the Murray Hill Bank, Respondents
169 N.Y. 589·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Timothy Mahoney, Respondent, v. George Bernhard et al., Defendants, and Henry W. Schmidt et al., as Executors of Henry Clausen, Jr., Deceased, et al., Appellants, and Edward H. Hobbs et al., as Receivers of the Murray Hill Bank, Respondents.
Mahoney v. Bernhard, 45 App. Div. 449, affirmed.
(Argued December 11, 1901;
decided December 31, 1901.)
Appeal from a final judgment of the Supreme Court, entered May 10, 1900, upon an order of the Appellate Division in the first judicial department, modifying and affirming as modified an interlocutory judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Louis Marshall, Samuel F. Jacobs, Benjamin N. Gardozo, A. J. Simpson and Gharles K. Beekman for appellants.
Henry D. Hotchkiss, William G. Breed and Henry H. Abbott for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Landon, Cullen and Werner, JJ.