Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles Alt et al., Respondents, v. Claus Doscher, Appellant, 1906 — 186 N.Y. 566 · caselaw · US
General
Charles Alt et al., Respondents, v. Claus Doscher, Appellant
186 N.Y. 566·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles Alt et al., Respondents, v. Claus Doscher, Appellant.
Alt v. Doscher, 102 App. Div. 344, affirmed.
(Argued October 17, 1906;
decided November 13, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 3, 1905, affirming a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New Y orle in favor of plaintiffs in an action to recover commissions alleged to have been earned in effecting a sale of real property.
Henry F. Goohrane for appellant.
George G. Bueehner for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Vann, Weenee and Hiscock, JJ. Absent: Geat, J. Not sitting: Willaed Baetlett, J.