Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Townsend v. United States; Cullen v. Village of Pelham Manor, New York, et al.; Hettinga et al. v. United States; Buckland et ux. v. Buckland et al.; McKay v. Chicago Transit Authority; Romero v. Apker, Warden; Hatches, aka Smith, aka Dove, aka Farvey v. United States; Garcia Rangel v. Schmidt et al.; Towbridge v. Tacker et al.; Booker v. Godinez, Director, Illinois Department of Corrections; Llorente v. Holder, Attorney General; Shulick v. Michigan et al.; Lyons v. Florida; Cody v. Butera et al.; Gerber v. Isabella Geriatric Center, Inc.; Potter v. Toei Animation Inc. et al., 2013 — 568 U.S. 1209 · caselaw · US