Corporations
In the Matter of the Application of EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, a New York Corporation, for a Writ of Prohibition against and/or a Writ of Mandamus to the Honorable Oliver B. Dickinson, District Judge of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
48 F.2d 128·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, a New York Corporation, for a Writ of Prohibition against and/or a Writ of Mandamus to the Honorable Oliver B. Dickinson, District Judge of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
No. 4565.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Feb. 16, 1931.
Charles W. Riley, of New York City, for petitioner.
Thomas Raeburn White, of Philadelphia, Pa., for United States District Court.
Before BUFFINGTON and WOOLLEY, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The questions raised on this motion are substantially the same as those raised on a like motion of the Eastman Kodak Company, a New Jersey Corporation, 48 F.(2d) 125, which we have just considered and decided.
The motion of this petitioner for a writ of prohibition is denied.