Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Smith; United States v. Public Utilities Commission of California et al.; County of Mineral, Nevada, v. Public Utilities Commission of California et al.; International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Local Union Number 406, et al. v. Postma, doing business as Harold F. Postma Gravel Co., et al.; California Electric Power Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.; Vahlberg v. Oklahoma; Friedman et al. v. United States; Binion v. United States; Sukowski v. Ragen, Warden; Maughs v. Royster, Superintendent of State Prison Farm; Johnson v. United States; Goodman et al. v. McMillan; Hourihan v. National Labor Relations Board et al., 1953 — 345 U.S. 961 · caselaw · US