Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Relative to Acquiring Title to the Lands Required for the Purpose of Opening Whitlock Avenue, from Hunt's Point Road to Westchester Avenue, in the Twenty-third Ward of the City of New York. William Simpson et al., as Executors of William Simpson, Deceased, Appellants; The City of New York et al., Respondents, 1900 — 163 N.Y. 606 · caselaw · US
Corporations
In the Matter of the Application of The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Relative to Acquiring Title to the Lands Required for the Purpose of Opening Whitlock Avenue, from Hunt's Point Road to Westchester Avenue, in the Twenty-third Ward of the City of New York. William Simpson et al., as Executors of William Simpson, Deceased, Appellants; The City of New York et al., Respondents
163 N.Y. 606·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Relative to Acquiring Title to the Lands Required for the Purpose of Opening Whitlock Avenue, from Hunt’s Point Road to Westchester Avenue, in the Twenty-third Ward of the City of New York. William Simpson et al., as Executors of William Simpson, Deceased, Appellants; The City of New York et al., Respondents.
Matter of Mayor, eta. (Whitloah Aw.), 51 App. Dir. 436, appeal dismissed.
(Argued June 7, 1900;
decided June 22, 1900.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 24, 1900, modifying and affirming as modified an order of Special Term denying a motion to confirm a report of the commissioners of estimate and assessment and directing that the report be returned to them for correction.
Barclay E. P. McCarty and Jared Q. Baldwvn Jr., for appellants.
John Whalen, Corporation Coumsel (Theodore Connoly, John P. Bunn and Thomas C. BlaTce of counsel), for the city of New York, respondent.
Truman H. Baldwin for Mary A. Hoe et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Landon and Cullen, JJ.