Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George S. Ingraham et al., Appellants, v. National Salt Company et al., Respondents, 1902 — 172 N.Y. 644 · caselaw · US
General
George S. Ingraham et al., Appellants, v. National Salt Company et al., Respondents
172 N.Y. 644·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George S. Ingraham et al., Appellants, v. National Salt Company et al., Respondents.
Ingraham, v. National Salt Co., 72 App. Div. 582, appeal dismissed.
(Argued November 11, 1902;
decided November 18, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment entered July 1, 1902, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, affirming an interlocutory judgment of Special Term sustaining demurrers to the complaint.
George 8. Ingraham for appellants. ■
W. B. Puhney, Henry B. Twombly and Charles W. Pierson for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Cullen, JJ. Absent: Vann, J.