Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
B. E. SACKETT, Appellant, v. SPECIAL SITE SIGN COMPANY, Appellee, 1935 — 75 F.2d 1019 · caselaw · US
General
B. E. SACKETT, Appellant, v. SPECIAL SITE SIGN COMPANY, Appellee
75 F.2d 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1935
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
B. E. SACKETT, Appellant, v. SPECIAL SITE SIGN COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 7802.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 18, 1935.
Peirson M. Hall, U. S. Atty., Leo V. Silverstein, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Charles W. Cradick, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before WILBUR and DENMAN, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon stipulation of counsel for respective parties, ordered appeal dismissed; mandate forthwith.