Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Village of Upper Nyack, Appellant, v. R. Dickinson Jewett, Respondent, 1905 — 181 N.Y. 514 · caselaw · US
General
The Village of Upper Nyack, Appellant, v. R. Dickinson Jewett, Respondent
181 N.Y. 514·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Village of Upper Nyack, Appellant, v. R. Dickinson Jewett, Respondent.
Village of Upper Nyack v. Jewett, 86 App. Div. 254, affirmed.
(Argued February 22, 1905;
decided March 14, 1905.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered September 12, 1903, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term, a jury having been waived, and granting a new trial.
Arthur S. TompMns for appellant.
jRalph E. Prime for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for defend. Unt on the stipulation, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Werner, JJ.