Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Pikes Peak Broadcasting Co. et al. v. Federal Communications Commission et al., 1969 — 395 U.S. 979 · caselaw · US
General
Pikes Peak Broadcasting Co. et al. v. Federal Communications Commission et al.
395 U.S. 979·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1500.
Pikes Peak Broadcasting Co. et al. v. Federal Communications Commission et al.
Richard Hildreth for Pikes Peak Broadcasting Co., and James A. McKenna and Vernon L. Wilkinson for Sangre De Cristo Broadcasting Corp., petitioners.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Howard E. Shapiro, Henry Getter, and D. Biard MacGuineas for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.