Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Rochester Folding Box Company, Respondent, v. George W. Browne et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others, 1904 — 179 N.Y. 542 · caselaw · US
General
Rochester Folding Box Company, Respondent, v. George W. Browne et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others
179 N.Y. 542·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Rochester Folding Box Company, Respondent, v. George W. Browne et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others.
Rochester Folding Box Oo. v. Browne, 55 App. Piv. 444, affirmed.
(Argued June 6, 1904;
decided August 5, 1904.)
Appeal from a judgment, entered August 5, 1902, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, affirming .an interlocutory judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
G. D. Kiehel for appellants.
Elbridge L. Adams for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Bartlett, Martin, Yann and Cullen, JJ. Absent: Haight, J. Taking no part: Werner, J.