Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Tannenbaum v. New York, 1967 — 389 U.S. 892 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Tannenbaum v. New York
389 U.S. 892·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 993,
October Term, 1966.
Tannenbaum v. New York,
Marvin M. Karpatkin on the motion.
[MAJORITY]
388 U. S. 439. Motion of New York Civil Liberties Union for leave to file brief, as amicus curiae, in support of petition for rehearing, granted. Rehearing denied.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.