General
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. et al. v. Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Co. et al.; and Interstate Commerce Commission v. Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Co. et al.
390 U.S. 940·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 925.
No. 938.
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. et al. v. Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Co. et al.; and Interstate Commerce Commission v. Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Co. et al.
Edward A. Kaier, Joseph F. Eshelman, Richard B. Montgomery, Jr., Eugene E. Hunt, Kenneth H. Landmark and Kemper A. Dobbins for appellants in No. 925, and Robert W. Ginnane and Arthur J. Cerra for appellant in No. 938. Ashton Phelps, Howard J. Trienens, George L. Saunders, Jr., John W. Adams, Philip C. Beverly, James A. Bistline, R. Wray Henriott and Donad L. Turkal for Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Co. et al., and Carl E. Sanders and Walter R. McDonald for Southern Governors’ Conference et al., appellees in both cases.
[MAJORITY]
Appeals from D. C. E. D. La. Probable jurisdiction noted. Cases consolidated and a total of two hours allotted for oral argument.
Reported below: 270 F. Supp. 695.