Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
North American Transportation and Trading Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. W. B. Gill, 1906 — 203 U.S. 579 · caselaw · US
General
North American Transportation and Trading Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. W. B. Gill
203 U.S. 579·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 35.
North American Transportation and Trading Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. W. B. Gill.
Submitted for plaintiff in error October 18, 1906.
Decided October 22, 1906.
Mr. Frederick Bausman for plaintiff, in error. No appearance for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Washington.
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with costs. Leon v. Galceran, 11 Wall. 185; American Steamboat Company v. Chase, 16 Wall. 522; The Robert W. Parsons, 191 U. S. 17, 36.