Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

United Biscuit Co. of America v. Federal Trade Commission; Austin v. Kentucky; Anders v. California; Fenix & Scisson, Inc. v. United States; Sullivan et ux. v. United States; Muncy et vir v. General Motors Corp.; Armored Carrier Corp. v. United States et al.; Madison v. United States; Calhoun v. Hertwig, Trustee, et al.; Jordan et al. v. United States; Muth, Administratrix, et al. v. Atlass et al.; Powell v. Committee on Admissions and Grievances et al.; Forrest v. United States, 1967 — 388 U.S. 924 · caselaw · US