Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Platt, Chief Judge, U. S. District Court, v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., 1963 — 374 U.S. 825 · caselaw · US
General
Platt, Chief Judge, U. S. District Court, v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
374 U.S. 825·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1064.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger and Robert B. Hummel for petitioner. John T. Chadwell, Jean Engstrom and John L. Connolly for respondent.
Platt, Chief Judge, U. S. District Court, v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted.