Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. et al. v. United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois et al., 1950 — 339 U.S. 941 · caselaw · US
General
E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. et al. v. United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois et al.
339 U.S. 941·Supreme Court of the United States·1950
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Miscellaneous Orders.
No. 430, Misc.
E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. et al. v. United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois et al.
Gerhard A. Gesell, Paul H. Arthur, John M. Harlan and Aaron Finger for petitioners.
Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Bergson and Charles H. Weston for the United States, respondent.
[MAJORITY]
The motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus and/or certiorari is denied.