Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Power Reactor Development Co. v. International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers, AFL-CIO, et al.; and United States et al. v. International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers, AFL-CIO, et al., 1960 — 364 U.S. 889 · caselaw · US
General
Power Reactor Development Co. v. International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers, AFL-CIO, et al.; and United States et al. v. International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers, AFL-CIO, et al.
364 U.S. 889·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 315.
Power Reactor Development Co. v. International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers, AFL-CIO, et al.; and United States et al. v. International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers, AFL-CIO, et al.
No. 454.
John Lord O’Brian, W. Graham Claytor, Jr. and Edward S. Reid, Jr. for petitioner in No. 315. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Morton Hollander, Courts Oulahan and Lionel Kestenbaum for petitioners in No. 454. Benjamin C. Sigal, Harold Cranefield and Lowell Goerlich for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit granted limited to Questions 1 and 2 presented by the petitions for writs of certiorari.
Reported below: 108 U. S. App. D. C. 97, 280 F. 2d 645.