Contracts · MBE-tested
Ker et ux. v. California
369 U.S. 846·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
April 16, 1962.
No. 617.
Ker et ux. v. California.
Robert W. Stanley for George D. Ker, petitioner.
Mr. Justice Frankfurter and Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of cases in which orders were this day announced.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari, 368 U. S. 974, to the District Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District. The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is granted.