Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Hoffa et al. v. United States, 1968 — 390 U.S. 924 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Hoffa et al. v. United States
390 U.S. 924·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Mr. Justice White and Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 912.
Hoffa et al. v. United States.
Morris A. Shenker, Joseph A. Fanelli, Jacques M. Schiffer, Cecil D. Branstetter, Harold E. Brown and Daniel B. Maher for petitioners. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice White and Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.