General
RAND, McNALLY & CO. v. KENTUCKY
215 U.S. 582·Supreme Court of the United States·1909
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
RAND, McNALLY & CO. v. KENTUCKY.
ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY.
No. 136.
Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 18, 1909.
Decided November 1, 1909.
A judgment of the state court affirmed without opinion on authority of previous decisions.
32 Ky. Law Rep. 1168, affirmed.
Mr. Amos C. Miller and Mr. Wm. M. Beckner for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Frederick S. Tyler and Mr. James C. Sims for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed, with costs. Chanute v. Trader, 132 U. S. 210; Wilson v. North Carolina, 169 U. S. 586; Central Land Co. v. Laidley, 159 U. S. 103; Bacon v. Texas, 163 U. S. 207; Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; White v. Leovy, 134 U. S. 91; Electric Co. v. Dow, 166 U. S. 489; Pierce v. Somerset Railway, 171 U. S. 641; Shepard v. Barron, 194 U. S. 553; Rand, McNally & Co. v. Commonwealth, 106 S. W. Rep. 238; S. C., 108 S. W. Rep. 892, 32 Ky. Law Rep. 441, 1168; Commonwealth v. Ginn & Co., 111 Kentucky, 110.