Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mitchell et al. v. Donovan, Secretary of State of Minnesota, et al., 1970 — 396 U.S. 1000 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Mitchell et al. v. Donovan, Secretary of State of Minnesota, et al.
396 U.S. 1000·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
Mr. Justice Harlan is of the opinion that further consideration of question of jurisdiction should be postponed to hearing on the merits.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 726.
Mitchell et al. v. Donovan, Secretary of State of Minnesota, et al.
Lynn S. Castner and Melvin L. Wulf for appellants. Douglas M. Head, Attorney General of Minnesota, pro se, Arne L. Schoeller, Chief Deputy Attorney General, and John R. Kenefick and James M. Kelley, Special Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from D. C. Minn. Probable jurisdiction noted.
Mr. Justice Harlan is of the opinion that further consideration of question of jurisdiction should be postponed to hearing on the merits.