Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Caroline Quade, Appellant, v. Peter Bertsch, Individually and as Executor and Trustee under the Will of William Broistedt, Deceased, et al., Respondents, 1903 — 173 N.Y. 615 · caselaw · US
General
Caroline Quade, Appellant, v. Peter Bertsch, Individually and as Executor and Trustee under the Will of William Broistedt, Deceased, et al., Respondents
173 N.Y. 615·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Caroline Quade, Appellant, v. Peter Bertsch, Individually and as Executor and Trustee under the Will of William Broistedt, Deceased, et al., Respondents.
Quads v. Bsrtssh, 65 App. Div. 600, affirmed.
(Argued January 12, 1903;
decided January 27, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 11, 1901, which affirmed a judgment of Special Term construing the will of William Broistedt, deceased.
James Moffett for appellant.
George S. Espencheid, S. M. & D. E. Meeker, Louis Ehrenberg and Thomas H. Troy for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann and Werner, JJ.