Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lincoln Electric Co. v. Forrestal, Secretary of National Defense, et al., 1948 — 334 U.S. 841 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Lincoln Electric Co. v. Forrestal, Secretary of National Defense, et al.
334 U.S. 841·Supreme Court of the United States·1948
Mr. Justice Burton took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
June 14, 1948.
No. 320.
Lincoln Electric Co. v. Forrestal, Secretary of National Defense, et al.
Ashley M., Van Duzer, Thomas V. Koykka and Charles Effinger Smoot for appellant. Solicitor General Perlman for ap-pellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The judgment is affirmed. Lichter v. United States, Pownall v. United States, and Alexander Wool Combing Co. v. United States, ante, p. 742, decided this day.
Mr. Justice Burton took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.